Deputy U.S. Special Envoy for the Middle East Morgan Ortagus recently reached out to Lebanese leadership—including President Joseph Aoun, Speaker Nabih Berri, and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam—urging the rapid formation of three joint working groups. These proposed groups, comprising both civilian experts and military personnel, are expected to tackle unresolved matters with Israel, including troop withdrawals, border demarcation, and the issue of captives.
U.S. sources indicated that some participants may include retired brigadier generals or seasoned diplomats, chosen for their strategic and regional expertise. According to the same sources, Ortagus’s message emphasized the importance of swift formation without applying political pressure, countering claims by some Lebanese political figures who interpreted the outreach as a form of coercion.
The primary goal of these working groups is to make tangible progress on sensitive files such as Israel’s military presence at five disputed points, contested areas along the Blue Line, and the return of Lebanese detainees. U.S. officials cautioned that any prolonged delay in assembling these groups could hinder efforts to move forward on these longstanding disputes.
Earlier this month, Ortagus publicly stated that the U.S. intends to facilitate talks between Lebanon and Israel to diplomatically address their unresolved differences. She highlighted that the discussions would be guided by working groups led by diplomats, and potentially supported by international partners.
During a televised interview, Ortagus voiced optimism that a comprehensive resolution could be reached on the five disputed points and broader issues related to the border. Her remarks underlined Washington’s desire to help both countries reach a peaceful and political settlement through structured and coordinated dialogue.
Reports from Al-Jadeed and other outlets also indicated that Ortagus warned of potential consequences should Lebanon fail to act. These included the possibility of the U.S. stepping back from its role in the ceasefire monitoring process, potentially leaving Israel with a freer hand in managing regional developments. However, American sources emphasized that Ortagus’s intention was to promote collaboration rather than to issue ultimatums.