Trump: Iran Decision Will Come Within Two Weeks

U.S. President Donald Trump has stated that Iran has at most two weeks to change its course and avoid potential American military action, suggesting that a decision could come sooner if circumstances dictate. The statement, made overnight, builds on a timeline he referenced the day before, as the conflict between Israel and Iran continues to escalate.

Speaking to reporters, Trump clarified that the two-week period is not fixed and emphasized that his decision may come earlier, depending on whether there is any progress. He indicated the intent behind the timeframe is to observe whether diplomatic or strategic changes occur in the interim.

The comments follow a statement issued on Thursday, in which Trump announced he would determine within two weeks whether to pursue military action, citing the possibility of negotiations with Tehran. This was widely interpreted as a potential diplomatic window aimed at defusing hostilities, with European nations quickly organizing meetings with Iranian officials.

Dismissal of European Diplomatic Efforts and Support for Israel’s Campaign

Despite these developments, Trump expressed skepticism toward European mediation. He dismissed talks held in Geneva between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and representatives from the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the European Union. Trump remarked that Iran is not interested in engaging with Europe, adding that the Islamic Republic prefers direct communication with the United States.

While en route to Morristown, New Jersey, for a fundraising event, Trump criticized the effectiveness of European diplomatic efforts. He stated plainly that Europe would not be able to contribute meaningfully to resolving the conflict. His remarks were made as tensions continued to mount in the Middle East.

During the Geneva discussions, Iran’s foreign minister reportedly stated that Tehran would not consider negotiations with the U.S. while Israeli military operations against Iranian targets persist. When asked whether Washington might request a halt to Israeli airstrikes to facilitate talks, Trump appeared hesitant. He noted that it’s more challenging to ask an advancing side to pause than one facing setbacks. Nonetheless, he affirmed that the U.S. remains open to discussions with Iran and is monitoring developments closely.

Conflicting Assessments on Iran’s Nuclear Capability

Trump also reiterated his position that Iran is nearing the ability to produce a nuclear weapon, suggesting that the country could be only weeks away. This stance contrasts with previous assessments from within his administration.

Earlier in the year, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard reported that Iran was not close to acquiring sufficient enriched uranium for a nuclear warhead. Trump openly rejected that conclusion, stating that Gabbard’s assessment was inaccurate. Gabbard, a known critic of U.S. military interventions, had been appointed to oversee the intelligence community, yet her report appears to have been overridden by the President’s more urgent view of the nuclear timeline.

Iran has consistently maintained that its nuclear activities are intended solely for peaceful applications, such as energy production and medical research. However, the growing scrutiny and military posturing from the United States and its allies reflect enduring concerns over the potential military dimensions of Iran’s program.

Mounting Pressure and Strategic Calculations

The rapidly shifting diplomatic and military environment highlights the complexity of the current standoff. Trump’s remarks underscore a willingness to act unilaterally and swiftly, even as international actors push for negotiated solutions. With Israel continuing its military campaign against Iranian assets and Iran refusing dialogue under current conditions, the coming days may prove decisive in determining whether the situation escalates further or shifts toward de-escalation.

As the U.S. administration weighs its options, the geopolitical implications of any potential military strike remain significant. The outcome of this high-stakes confrontation could shape regional dynamics and global security for years to come.