This week, a series of deadly blasts from pagers and walkie-talkies revealed a significant breach in Hezbollah’s communication networks across Lebanon, resulting in at least 37 fatalities, including children, and injuring over 3,000 individuals.
In response to the blasts, Hezbollah has threatened reprisal against Israel, though it remains uncertain how the Iran-supported militia will react given the compromise to their operational security.
Israel’s Defense Minister has indicated the onset of a “new era” in its military strategy, suggesting a focus shift towards the north, near the Lebanese border. This statement subtly confirms the military’s involvement in the communications equipment explosions.
The covert operations executed this week pose a risk of escalating tensions in the already volatile region. Here are the key developments:
Cross-border Engagements
Significant military exchanges occurred between Israel and Hezbollah on Thursday. The Israeli military reported targeting around 100 rocket launchers, while Hezbollah claimed at least 17 strikes on Israeli military sites.
Israeli Military Activity in Beirut
During Nasrallah’s initial speech post-attacks, Israel conducted low altitude flights over Beirut, releasing flares and causing sonic booms, an event captured live by CNN’s Ben Wedeman.
Retaliation Promises
Hezbollah leader Nasrallah has sternly condemned the covert strikes on communication devices, declaring that Israel has breached critical limits and promising forthcoming retaliation.
Iran’s Stance
The Revolutionary Guard Corps Commander Hossein Salami of Iran conveyed to Nasrallah that Israel will face a potent and decisive retaliation from the “axis of resistance,” a coalition of Shia militias across four Middle Eastern nations.
Hezbollah’s Capabilities
Known as the most heavily armed non-state actor globally, Hezbollah now finds its reputation for being well-equipped and disciplined compromised due to the device attacks.
International Reaction
A panel of United Nations experts has criticized the attacks on communication devices, labeling them as serious violations of international law and the human right to life, describing these actions as “terrifying.”