Tweet and shout: Lebanon's new 'Civil War'

Mouafac Harb

A civil war is raging among Lebanese not on the streets of Beirut, but on social media outlets, leaving doubts whether Lebanon is anytime closer to become a stable and cohesive country.

Lebanese political parties, formerly militias, are feuding a digital civil war by asking their followers and sympathizers to post insults and accusations filled with bigotry and hate messages against their rivals. Videos, infographics and trolls have replaced political graffiti and street signs that once painted walls and squares during the Civil War.

Main political parties are providing training on how to wage disinformation campaigns, and for that they are seeking the help of digital marketing firms to train their electronic militia on digital warfare and political assassinations. Ironically, groups are hiring professional journalists to create fake news and write defaming texts.

All the themes of the ugly Civil War are re-emerging in the form of tweets, doctored videos and racist jokes and are swamping the social media networks and WhatsApp groups.

Hitting a military target is the equivalent of a post or a video going viral.

The grim reality is that the younger generation are the ones using social media the most and are exposed to these toxic messages if not participating in spreading the party line and engaging rivals.

Monitoring engagements and assessing sentiments of users, lead to believe that the country is a powder keg awaiting a foreign power willing to exploit and underwrite a military conflict.

Instead of purchasing Russian AK-47 and ammunition, political parties are arming their cyber militants with fake accounts that can’t be detected and traced back by law enforcement agencies or lawyers looking to air perpetrators.

This is how it works:

The digital and communication units within each group get temporary phone numbers and use it to create fake accounts and purchase bots, mainly from Russian firms, which provide them with an application to control the bots and disseminate the message.

It costs between $0.4 and $1 to buy a fake accounts from mainly Russian firms.

It takes 500 accounts in order to guarantee a trend among the top 20 in a given time. And the provided application to control the bots can guarantee several trends and maintain the top ranking. It is a territorial warfare where groups are trying to assert their presence in the digital world.

The problems with certain misleading messages, they become true because people tend to believe rumors and fake information , and it would require a major public relations campaign to reverse or at least neutralize the wrong information.

Political leaders craft their speeches in sound-bites and catchy hashtags then their followers and electronic armies begin tweeting and posting on social media to make it a top trend.

Social media companies are not regulating enough the monsters they have created, either because they don’t want to affect their revenues or because the local market in not a top priority. Despite attempts to keep bad guys away and canceling bots, the reality is that electronic armies and digital marketing firms continue to manipulate information and mislead innocent users and subsequently the public opinion at large.

While conventional media and mainstream news organizations are struggling to survive financially, It is safe to say more money is being spent to disinform than to generate accurate news and inform.

Judging from the tone of posts and tweets and engagements, the Lebanese national identity is still work in progress, and faraway from marching toward a civil secular nation.

Lebanese tend to show unity in the aftermath of disaster but in time of peace old divisions and grudges resurface.

Lebanon is celebrating its centennial but Lebanon is still faraway from becoming a cohesive nation with a defined national identity.

Some argue that because Hezbollah is the only armed party, others found no other alternative but to express their opposition and discontent in the social media. Following the Taif Accord all parties had to disarm except Hezbollah, which maintained its arsenal under the banner of resisting the Israeli occupation in the south.

Social media played an important role during the “Arab Spring”. It helped people and activists express their opinion and voice their criticism in a state-controlled media environment. In other words it helped create a democratic debate and provided a space for people to voice their views, however, it is beening hijacked by organized firms and intelligence units and used for propaganda, smear campaigns and fake news to discredit the opposition. Like any good invention in the past it could be used for the good of humankind or turned into weapons of mass destruction, and in this case weapons of mass deception.

What was supposed to promote democracy is simply undermining it and it became a tool to suppress democratic voices.

Mouafac Harb is a veteran American-Lebanese journalist based in Beirut.





Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.

Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.

Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (

comments powered by Disqus



Interested in knowing more about this story?

Click here