Middle East

Egypt risks Islamist splits, violence after ouster

Supporters of ousted Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi are seen through an Islamist flag as they chant slogans during a rally near the University of Cairo, Giza, Egypt, Friday, July 5, 2013.(AP Photo/Hassan Ammar)

CAIRO: Some 200,000 people died in a decade of civil war in Algeria after uniformed officers rejected a popular vote for Islamists, an example some in Cairo darkly cite after the army ousted Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood president Wednesday. While Algeria’s Islamists were never allowed to govern, Egypt’s Mohammad Mursi ran the country for a year, and a widespread sense that he was author of his own misfortunes may deter some who might have taken up arms in his cause.

But his removal could still split Islamist groups that have entered Egyptian politics since a 2011 uprising toppled Hosni Mubarak, an autocrat who repressed them for decades.

Egyptian Islamists such as the Brotherhood and their erstwhile ultraconservative allies risk losing those followers, especially among the young, who conclude Egypt’s democratic experiment has failed and peaceful politics will get them nowhere.

Mursi’s National Security Adviser Essam al-Haddad wrote in a valedictory Facebook post, “The message will resonate throughout the Muslim World loud and clear: Democracy is not for Muslims.”

As authorities rounded up some of the Brotherhood’s most prominent figures, one of its senior members, Mohammad al-Beltagy, laid bare the dangers at a pro-Mursi sit-in outside a Cairo Mosque Thursday.

“The issue now is the position of the free world that is pushing the country to a state of chaos and pushing groups other than the Brotherhood to return to the idea of change by force.”

The rhetoric has heated up since the army first said it might intervene after millions of protesters flooded the streets to demand Mursi’s resignation.

“You’ve made new mujahedeen, new people who will seek martyrdom. Know that if one out of every 10 of those here blows himself up, you are the reason,” said one man, referring to army chief Gen. Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, in a YouTube video purportedly taken at a large pro-Mursi rally in Cairo this week.

Hours before the army removed Mursi, Mohammad Nufil, a 44-year-old government employee at the same rally, said he was certain the president’s supporters would turn to violence if the army aborted what they saw as a legitimate democratic process.

“If there is a coup, Egypt will have two options: It will become like Syria, or it will become like Algeria in the ’90s. That is the alternative. It will happen,” he said.

Most Mursi supporters see the military intervention as a coup, while Egyptian authorities say they were merely responding to the demands of the Egyptian people.

Egypt has been a crucible of militant Islamist movements for decades, and its government a regular focus of their ire.

The three main presidents that have served since 1952, when a coup installed military-backed rule, have all accused Islamists of trying to kill them. In the case of Anwar Sadat, who made peace with Israel, they succeeded.

In the 1990s, Islamist insurgents waged a bloody campaign against security forces in southern Egypt.

Al-Gamaa Al-Islamiya, which carried out some of the most deadly attacks, eventually renounced violence and formed a political party after Mubarak was toppled.

But some Gamaa members have said publicly that they would take up arms again to defend Mursi, a threat the group’s leaders are now trying to play down, and which is controversial among the Islamist rank and file.

“If the army dares to kill democracy in Egypt, we will fight them,” Mohammad al-Amin, a 40-year-old Gamaa member, said hours ahead of the army decree, gesturing to the thousands of supporters who had gathered at the pro-Mursi rally in Cairo.

Sobhy Youssef, 45, a Brotherhood supporter sitting nearby, interrupted him: “No, no, my brother,” he said. “We are not taking up weapons. What we are taking up is our patience and our faith in God.”

Khalil al-Anani, an expert on political Islam at Britain’s Durham University, said the risk of low-level violence in Egypt was significant, especially in the Sinai Peninsula, which has descended into lawlessness since Mubarak was ousted.

But groups like Gamaa had been chastened by the disastrous results of their insurgency in the ’90s.

“Islamists know very well that violence is not the solution,” Anani said.

Still, the army’s ouster of Mursi may help militant groups like Al-Qaeda advance their argument that democracy is not the way forward, he added. “Now, they would say, ‘Look, this is the democracy that you were fighting for.’”

The potency of that argument will depend on how the military handles the transition and how well Islamists that have signed up to its “road map” are able to hold their ranks together.

The ultraconservative Nour Party, Egypt’s second-biggest Islamist political movement after the Brotherhood, has endorsed the army plan. Like Gamaa, it has urged its followers to refrain from violence.

“Before anyone decides to sacrifice themselves for the sake of President Mursi’s position, they must think that perhaps they will end up losing both things,” the group said Thursday.

But engaging with the military plan could also alienate members.

Yassir al-Sirri, a former militant who lives in London where he runs an Islamic media and rights group, said the army’s “coup” against Mursi had pushed Egypt into a dangerous phase.

“Now people do not have faith in peaceful action, and they do not believe change can come through a peaceful route. This is the problem,” he said.

Egypt had the chance to bring young Islamists into a formal political framework, working in public, but this was now at risk, he said. “Unless the situation is corrected as soon as possible, we are going backward again.”

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Daily Star on July 06, 2013, on page 11.




Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.

Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.

Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)

comments powered by Disqus



Interested in knowing more about this story?

Click here