Child marriage law stokes fears of looming theocracy in Iraq

File - A banner in Baghdad supporting the legislation reads: “The Jaafari Personal Status Law saves my rights and my dignity.”

BAGHDAD: Proposals that would legalize the marriage of 9-year-old Iraqi girls are unlikely to become law, but indicate the growing role of religion in a country some fear is going down the path of neighboring theocracy Iran.

Based on Shiite Islamic jurisprudence, the Jaafari Law’s advocates say it would bring regulation of personal status – comprising family law, wills and inheritance – into line with Shariah.

It describes girls as reaching puberty at 9, making them fit for marriage, grants fathers sole guardianship of their children from the age of 2, and entitles a husband to insist on sexual intercourse with his wife whenever he desires.

Iraq’s clerical establishment does not back the bill, making its chance of success very slim. Critics say the draft is all about short-term political advantage, as Shiite parties compete with each other for votes in the runup to April 30 elections in a highly charged sectarian atmosphere.

“It’s a completely shameless political stunt,” said Haider Ala Hamoudi, associate professor of law at the University of Pittsburgh who writes on Iraqi, Middle Eastern and Islamic law.

Parliament adjourns this month for the national elections, so the bill will have to be taken up again by the next government, which is expected to take months to form.

The proposed legislation has nonetheless drawn the ire of secular and women’s activists who fear their rights have been steadily eroded in Iraq in the years following the overthrow of dictator Saddam Hussein.

Critics say the law, which would apply only to the country’s Shiite majority, also institutionalizes religious divisions.

“It creates sectarianism,” said women’s rights activist Hanna Eduar, who described the bill as a “crime against humanity.”

“It destroys the unity of national legislation based on the personal status law.”

The existing personal status law – passed in 1959 – is often held up as the most progressive in the Middle East. It does not differentiate between sects, and sets the minimum age of marriage for both men and women at 18.

Proponents of the new law say many girls are married off underage anyway, particularly in the rural south, so the bill would protect young brides by codifying their status.

“The law does not make the marriage of underage girls obligatory,” said Shiite women’s rights activist Thabat al-Unaibi, adding she would not let her own two daughters marry until they were old enough to have finished their studies.

Today’s Shiite parties all trace their roots back to the 1950s, when Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s own Dawa party was formed in reaction to clerics’ alarm that Islam was becoming irrelevant in 20th-century Iraq.

That has changed since 2003, as Shiite parties came to power through the ballot box.

“For more than 1,000 years, our sect was living underground, a sect which is not officially recognized,” said Sheikh Mohammad al-Humaydawi, a Shiite cleric and candidate in the upcoming elections.

He backs the bill, but said: “I think this step proves our existence, more than being an expression of Shiite jurisprudence.”

The Jaafari Law, named after a jurist from the early years of Islam, was approved by the Cabinet in February along with another draft that sought to return control over personal status matters to the clergy by creating a supreme council to preside over the judiciary.

For some, the move shows how far Iraq has fallen under the sway of neighboring Iran, where Ayatollah Khamenei holds ultimate authority at the apex of a political order known as “Velayet e-Faqih” (“guardianship of the jurist”).

“Drafting a law showing clearly that a government institution lies beneath the authority of a supreme Shiite cleric means Iraq is likely to end as a state following the Velayet-e-Faqih,” said lawyer and constitutional expert Ahmed Younis.

“This is a very dangerous precedent,” he said.

Iraqi Justice Minister Hasan al-Shimari stuffed a copy of the draft law though the golden grate surrounding a tomb in the holy city of Najaf that contains the remains of Ali, a revered Shiite imam, in a gesture apparently intended to show the bill’s significance.

Shimari, who proposed the draft law, is a member of the small Islamist Fadila (Virtue) party allied with Maliki, who is seeking a third term in office.

Political analysts say the law might increase Fadhila’s share of seats in parliament – a modest seven – at the expense of Shiite parties opposed to Maliki’s re-election bid.

“In a sense it helps [Maliki] too, even though he’s not campaigning on this issue,” said Kirk Sowell, a Jordan-based political risk analyst and publisher of Inside Iraqi Politics.

Defending the draft law, Shimari denied that it was politically motivated, dismissed secular and Sunni opposition and accused some Shiite parties of sacrificing higher principles by failing to come out strongly in favor.

“Of course, there are those who don’t believe in Islam as a system to organize the affairs of life,” he said in a television interview.

“Then there are others who have dealt with this law from a political vantage point, even if they share our ideological vision.”

But how to turn that vision into legislation is itself a subject of contention, and the Jaafari Law has not won the crucial backing of the clerical establishment in Najaf.

One of Iraq’s four main Shi’ite leaders, Ayatollah Basheer al-Najafi, said the law contained “vagaries” and no jurist would approve it, deferring to the country’s most influential cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, who has yet to weigh in.

“Even Najaf, which I suppose would be most empowered by this sort of legislation, doesn’t seem to support it,” Hamoudi said.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Daily Star on April 18, 2014, on page 9.




Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.

Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.

Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (

comments powered by Disqus



Interested in knowing more about this story?

Click here